|Date Added:||1 April 2014|
|File Size:||6.40 Mb|
|Operating Systems:||Windows NT/2000/XP/2003/2003/7/8/10 MacOS 10/X|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Plastic and assembly are really Camelott, but for 89 EUR It doesn’t really do much more that would be useful for me can’t really see myself using that software. A good option would probably the Lexicon Alpha.
All user reviews for the Edirol UA-1EX
So maybe if you want to spend less than on the Focusrite look at something from Berhinger. Subscribe to our free newsletter Subscribe. Our members also liked: The audio interface is quite comprehensive and it is one of the few models in this price range that provides digital inputs and outputs.
I’m having a hard time trying esirol find an equivalent replacement.
Replacement for UA-1EX
It’s really cheap and pretty good. The latency isn’t the best, but even with more expensive USB interfaces you won’t get better results when working with a DAW. Cookies help us improve performance, enhance user experience and deliver our services. The Motu Ecirol is over double the price of the 2i2, and well out of my budget.
You orland to close the software, disconnect the audio interface, switch the jumper to the play position and relaunch the software!!! What I like least: DVDdoug on Write a user review Ask for a user review. Very practical for monitoring and recording simultaneously correct quality trs.
Once you try to reduce this value you’ll start to have serious problems. I don’t like the rolqnd that you have to set the sampling rate before you turn on the computer or plug the audio interface. The recording and playback quality is rather good. MOTU Microbook Personally I think the software it comes with Cuemix in particular makes it worth the difference in price but everyones budget is different.
Edirol by Roland USB Audio Interface Ua-1ex | eBay
The RCA outputs deliver a good sound definition, especially at 96 kHz where the soundcard really excels. Sort by most recent most useful. Did you find this review helpful?
Therefore you also have to disconnect the unit to change its sample rate. The analog RCA input is bridged with the mic input and there is no input selector nor edlrol separate control for each, so if you want to record a high level signal you get tons of noise, even without a mic.
Is there any similar device worth considering? I think the Scarlett 2i2 would be ideal considering the alternatives – it’s the kind of form factor I’m looking for something I can put on top of my PC underneath the desk and access easily and I can get over the non-consumer grade connections.
The setting is very easy. What I’m looking for is basically this: Hence it is important to set the level of the source correctly for recording. Rolaand in Become a member. Go with a Firewire for that. They advertise the soundcard emphasizing its sound quality and proclaiming that it allows you to enhance the poor audio capabilities of the laptop’s integrated soundcard